Write the shot. Compare what each model makes of it.
Text to video is the plainest version of the idea: describe a shot, get a clip. What separates results is less the wording than the model behind it, and every model reads a prompt differently.
Framiq keeps the prompt and swaps the engine. The same paragraph can go to Seedance 2.5, Veo, Kling, Hailuo, Wan or LTX from one screen, on one balance, which is the only practical way to learn which one suits the kind of shot you actually make.
Prompts that describe a shot — subject, action, framing, lens movement, light — beat prompts that describe a feeling. Seedance 2.5 accepts very long prompts, so there is room to be specific about what happens second by second rather than hoping for the best.
Some things are faster to show than to write. Attach photos and the model anchors to them: a face, a product, a location. It is the difference between "a red vintage sports car" and this exact car.
Iterate on a fast, inexpensive model until the composition is right, then re-run the winning prompt on a flagship for the final. One balance covers both, so exploration does not cost flagship money.
Concrete visual detail and a clear action. Name the subject, what it does, how it is framed, how the camera moves and what the light is like. Vague mood words give the model room to drift.
Framiq gives 20 credits at signup with no card, enough for several short clips. Beyond that the models cost real money to run, so renders draw from a credit balance.
Seedance 2.5 if people appear in the shot, because it holds identity best and takes the longest clips. Veo or Kling for cinematic and high-resolution work. LTX when you just need to see the idea quickly.